Experiments · E196

Do two more of the search's best finds hold up in full quantum calculations?

Partly. One matched within 2.7 meV/atom; the molybdenum–niobium one came out 28 meV/atom shallower than the energy model said.

In the log: prediction, written before pw.x (23:12)

mixedDate 2026-09-20 20:15, as written in the logrung 4 · DFT0 predictions · 2 result paragraphsEXPERIMENTS.md lines 12316–12333, lines 12993–13005
exp E196 diagram
What E196 did and how it came out, drawn from this record and the files it names (book/assets/diagrams/exp/E196.svg).

Results

EXPERIMENTS.md · line 12316

E196 — prediction, written before pw.x (23:12). E193's top four finds as 54-atom cells at the standard (60/720, 4×4×4, MV 0.02, local-TF 0.1), one decoration each (seed 0), vs refs_v3_fit.json. Find 1 = E194 (Mo33Ti19Nb2, on record −96.2). Finds 2 and 4 round to the same alloy (Mo35Nb18Ti1 / Mo36Nb18, L1 0.04 < 0.15), so find 4 stands for both. Cell-specific v5 predictions (the number DFT is held to, not the composition mean):

cell v5 (this decoration) v5 random k=8 E193 drive_cold
find3 Mo35Ta12Ti7 −96.4 −92.4 ± 7.0 −76.1
find4 Mo36Nb18 −91.1 −92.7 ± 7.2 −90.2

Prediction: both DFT cells within 15 meV/atom of the cell-specific v5 value. A miss enters v6 training (merge_dft_store.py); a miss > 30 meV on Mo36Nb18 says v5's Mo–Nb interior is wrong, the one binary E193 keeps returning to. Queue: local, behind E191 (5 cells of 16 atoms) → E192 (8 × 54 atoms, ~3 h each) → E194 → E196; that is ~30 h of pw.x, so E196 does not land tonight. Colab is not an option at the 45-min-per-job rule: a 54-atom standard cell takes ~3 h on six cores and the L4 runtime has six. Builder: scripts/validate/e196_cells.py; chain runs/e196_chain.sh; inputs runs/e196_dft/.

EXPERIMENTS.md · line 12993

E196 result (2026-09-20 20:15) — the generator's finds at rung 4: two of three confirmed, and the miss is the one that was pre-registered.

cell DFT v5 (this decoration) diff bar 15
E194 Mo₃₃Ti₁₉Nb₂ −88.1 −96.2 +8.1 confirmed
find3 Mo₃₅Ta₁₂Ti₇ −99.1 −96.4 −2.7 confirmed
find4 Mo₃₆Nb₁₈ −63.1 −91.1 +28.1 falsified
Mo₃₅Ta₁₂Ti₇ at −99.1 meV/atom is the deepest first-principles formation energy the project has
produced for an alloy nobody named before, and v5 called it to 3 meV. Mo₃₆Nb₁₈ is 28 meV
shallower than v5 says — the pre-registered reading applies almost to the letter ("a miss

30 on Mo₃₆Nb₁₈ says v5's Mo–Nb interior is wrong, the one binary E193 keeps returning to"). It is also where E201b's fly finds cluster (Mo-rich Mo–Nb), so the generator's favourite basin is one the model overstates by ~28 meV. Both rows stored; they are exactly the rows the rung-0 refit needs (this is where the flywheel does help — formation energies, not ordering).

The full record

This entry is written in 2 separate places in the log, shown here in log order.

EXPERIMENTS.md · lines 12316–12333

E196 — prediction, written before pw.x (23:12). E193's top four finds as 54-atom cells at the standard (60/720, 4×4×4, MV 0.02, local-TF 0.1), one decoration each (seed 0), vs refs_v3_fit.json. Find 1 = E194 (Mo33Ti19Nb2, on record −96.2). Finds 2 and 4 round to the same alloy (Mo35Nb18Ti1 / Mo36Nb18, L1 0.04 < 0.15), so find 4 stands for both. Cell-specific v5 predictions (the number DFT is held to, not the composition mean):

cell v5 (this decoration) v5 random k=8 E193 drive_cold
find3 Mo35Ta12Ti7 −96.4 −92.4 ± 7.0 −76.1
find4 Mo36Nb18 −91.1 −92.7 ± 7.2 −90.2

Prediction: both DFT cells within 15 meV/atom of the cell-specific v5 value. A miss enters v6 training (merge_dft_store.py); a miss > 30 meV on Mo36Nb18 says v5's Mo–Nb interior is wrong, the one binary E193 keeps returning to. Queue: local, behind E191 (5 cells of 16 atoms) → E192 (8 × 54 atoms, ~3 h each) → E194 → E196; that is ~30 h of pw.x, so E196 does not land tonight. Colab is not an option at the 45-min-per-job rule: a 54-atom standard cell takes ~3 h on six cores and the L4 runtime has six. Builder: scripts/validate/e196_cells.py; chain runs/e196_chain.sh; inputs runs/e196_dft/.

EXPERIMENTS.md · lines 12993–13005

E196 result (2026-09-20 20:15) — the generator's finds at rung 4: two of three confirmed, and the miss is the one that was pre-registered.

cell DFT v5 (this decoration) diff bar 15
E194 Mo₃₃Ti₁₉Nb₂ −88.1 −96.2 +8.1 confirmed
find3 Mo₃₅Ta₁₂Ti₇ −99.1 −96.4 −2.7 confirmed
find4 Mo₃₆Nb₁₈ −63.1 −91.1 +28.1 falsified
Mo₃₅Ta₁₂Ti₇ at −99.1 meV/atom is the deepest first-principles formation energy the project has
produced for an alloy nobody named before, and v5 called it to 3 meV. Mo₃₆Nb₁₈ is 28 meV
shallower than v5 says — the pre-registered reading applies almost to the letter ("a miss

30 on Mo₃₆Nb₁₈ says v5's Mo–Nb interior is wrong, the one binary E193 keeps returning to"). It is also where E201b's fly finds cluster (Mo-rich Mo–Nb), so the generator's favourite basin is one the model overstates by ~28 meV. Both rows stored; they are exactly the rows the rung-0 refit needs (this is where the flywheel does help — formation energies, not ordering).

Related entries

Built with PRISMWebsite and visualizations made using Claude