Did the generator really never find the chromium–nickel alloy?
No. It found Cr0.62Ni0.38, ranked 32 of 74; only the top eight rows were ever reported, so the earlier claim is withdrawn.
In the log: Withdrawn: the generator did find Cr-Ni. I reported the top eight.
recordedDate not stated in the log; it was written between the commit of 2026-09-13 08:16 and the first commit that contains it, 2026-09-16 02:04unclassified0 predictions · 1 result paragraphEXPERIMENTS.md lines 6033–6042
What E103 did and how it came out, drawn from this record and the files it names (book/assets/diagrams/exp/E103.svg).
Results
EXPERIMENTS.md · line 6033
E103 — Withdrawn: the generator did find Cr-Ni. I reported the top eight.
Fable read runs/odt_map/gen_ladder.json; I had not. Verified:
Cr0.62 Ni0.38
rank 32 of 74, drive -82, sigma 49, reward -29
late-transition-metal-only compositions in the file
5
best composition by DRIVE
Mo0.62 Nb0.38 at -108, better than any W-Ta
corr(late-TM fraction, sigma)
+0.873
The full record
EXPERIMENTS.md · lines 6033–6042
E103 — Withdrawn: the generator did find Cr-Ni. I reported the top eight.
Fable read runs/odt_map/gen_ladder.json; I had not. Verified:
Cr0.62 Ni0.38
rank 32 of 74, drive -82, sigma 49, reward -29
late-transition-metal-only compositions in the file
Built with PRISMWebsite and visualizations made using Claude