Can a few dozen of our own DFT cells pin down each element's reference energy?
Not yet. The 48-cell run was interrupted after 10 cells, restarted, and is still running; no correction has been measured.
In the log: pin the label frame's pure-element references with QE anchor cells (pre-registered 2026-09-23 16:3x)
runningDate 2026-09-23 16:3x, as written in the logrung 4 · DFT3 predictions · 1 result paragraphEXPERIMENTS.md lines 16143–16167, lines 16264–16269
What E239 did and how it came out, drawn from this record and the files it names (book/assets/diagrams/exp/E239.svg).
Pre-registration
(1)
δμ for
Mo, Nb, Ta, V, W is within ±5 meV (well-pinned references).
no verdict written against it
(2)
The per-cell residual sd after
the fit is ≤ 10 meV/atom (E232: four cells within 13).
no verdict written against it
(3)
At least one of δμ_Ti, δμ_Cr, δμ_Hf
differs from zero by > 2σ, and the fitted values land nearer the MEDIAN references than the minimum
(my prior, not a certainty — the E238 early read points the other way).
no verdict written against it
The pre-registration, as written
E239 — pin the label frame's pure-element references with QE anchor cells (pre-registered 2026-09-23 16:3x)
Problem. The eCE's formation-energy labels subtract one RHEA pure-bcc reference per element.
Ti, Cr and Hf are poorly pinned: Ti has 3 pure frames, Hf's 12 corrected frames spread 34
meV/atom, and the two defensible estimators (median, minimum) differ by 33.5 / 28.1 / 22.0 meV per
unit fraction of Ti / Cr / Hf. A MACE-free route (DFT-force harmonic correction + E(V) fit on the
pure frames) was tried and fails: the Ti and Hf frames span a = 3.0–3.6 Å and are heavily rattled;
even Mo scatters 28 meV that way. The error is composition-linear, so it cancels in every energy
difference at fixed composition (ordering, rung 1) and moves only absolute formation energies
(rung 0's drive and hull screen). Fix: measure it. ~48 of RHEA's own ordered cells, recomputed in
QE at the v3 standard (60/720 Ry, k 0.16 Å⁻¹, MV 0.02, non-spin as RHEA — E232's settings), each on
ideal sites at the label's relaxed volume; formation energy against refs_v3_fit. Then
E_form(QE) − E_form(label) = Σᵢ xᵢ δμᵢ + ε, least squares, bootstrap intervals. Selection, fixed
before any DFT: RHEA bcc_alloys_ordered rows in the final label set that are trusted, have
|correction| ≤ 30 meV/atom and ≤ 16 atoms; stratified so every element appears in ≥ 8 cells and
every Ti/Cr/Hf pairing with the other eight elements in ≥ 1; seed-fixed. None of these cells is in
the eleven QE cells or E223's three, which stay the independent test. Predictions. (1) δμ for
Mo, Nb, Ta, V, W is within ±5 meV (well-pinned references). (2) The per-cell residual sd after
the fit is ≤ 10 meV/atom (E232: four cells within 13). (3) At least one of δμ_Ti, δμ_Cr, δμ_Hf
differs from zero by > 2σ, and the fitted values land nearer the MEDIAN references than the minimum
(my prior, not a certainty — the E238 early read points the other way). Decision: every δμ that
is > 2σ from zero is applied to the labels as a composition-linear correction; rung 0 is refitted on
the corrected labels and scored on the unchanged independent cells; rung 1 needs no refit for a
pure reference shift (checked by the E238 diagnostic's ordering rows). Script written by Fable,
scripts/dft/e239_anchor_references.py; runs on the A100.
Results
EXPERIMENTS.md · line 16264
E239 interrupted 19:56–20:31 (20:3x record). A rewrite of the shared colab_pwx.py drop-in
dropped its executable bit; E239's launch of cell i16555 failed with PermissionError and the chain
stopped after 10 of 48 cells. Restarted at 20:31 (resume-safe: the 10 finished cells were read from
disk, the empty cell relaunched); first-run log kept as runs/e239_anchor_references.part1.log. A
test now asserts the drop-in stays executable. The spin-ladder known-answer run's local driver died in
the same window; its A100 stage job kept running and was re-adopted (runs/scf_spin_test/adopt_orphan.py).
The full record
This entry is written in 2 separate places in the log, shown here in log order.
EXPERIMENTS.md · lines 16143–16167
E239 — pin the label frame's pure-element references with QE anchor cells (pre-registered 2026-09-23 16:3x)
Problem. The eCE's formation-energy labels subtract one RHEA pure-bcc reference per element.
Ti, Cr and Hf are poorly pinned: Ti has 3 pure frames, Hf's 12 corrected frames spread 34
meV/atom, and the two defensible estimators (median, minimum) differ by 33.5 / 28.1 / 22.0 meV per
unit fraction of Ti / Cr / Hf. A MACE-free route (DFT-force harmonic correction + E(V) fit on the
pure frames) was tried and fails: the Ti and Hf frames span a = 3.0–3.6 Å and are heavily rattled;
even Mo scatters 28 meV that way. The error is composition-linear, so it cancels in every energy
difference at fixed composition (ordering, rung 1) and moves only absolute formation energies
(rung 0's drive and hull screen). Fix: measure it. ~48 of RHEA's own ordered cells, recomputed in
QE at the v3 standard (60/720 Ry, k 0.16 Å⁻¹, MV 0.02, non-spin as RHEA — E232's settings), each on
ideal sites at the label's relaxed volume; formation energy against refs_v3_fit. Then
E_form(QE) − E_form(label) = Σᵢ xᵢ δμᵢ + ε, least squares, bootstrap intervals. Selection, fixed
before any DFT: RHEA bcc_alloys_ordered rows in the final label set that are trusted, have
|correction| ≤ 30 meV/atom and ≤ 16 atoms; stratified so every element appears in ≥ 8 cells and
every Ti/Cr/Hf pairing with the other eight elements in ≥ 1; seed-fixed. None of these cells is in
the eleven QE cells or E223's three, which stay the independent test. Predictions. (1) δμ for
Mo, Nb, Ta, V, W is within ±5 meV (well-pinned references). (2) The per-cell residual sd after
the fit is ≤ 10 meV/atom (E232: four cells within 13). (3) At least one of δμ_Ti, δμ_Cr, δμ_Hf
differs from zero by > 2σ, and the fitted values land nearer the MEDIAN references than the minimum
(my prior, not a certainty — the E238 early read points the other way). Decision: every δμ that
is > 2σ from zero is applied to the labels as a composition-linear correction; rung 0 is refitted on
the corrected labels and scored on the unchanged independent cells; rung 1 needs no refit for a
pure reference shift (checked by the E238 diagnostic's ordering rows). Script written by Fable,
scripts/dft/e239_anchor_references.py; runs on the A100.
EXPERIMENTS.md · lines 16264–16269
E239 interrupted 19:56–20:31 (20:3x record). A rewrite of the shared colab_pwx.py drop-in
dropped its executable bit; E239's launch of cell i16555 failed with PermissionError and the chain
stopped after 10 of 48 cells. Restarted at 20:31 (resume-safe: the 10 finished cells were read from
disk, the empty cell relaunched); first-run log kept as runs/e239_anchor_references.part1.log. A
test now asserts the drop-in stays executable. The spin-ladder known-answer run's local driver died in
the same window; its A100 stage job kept running and was re-adopted (runs/scf_spin_test/adopt_orphan.py).
Related entries
E232 — are RHEA's deep ordered labels right? (pre-registered 2026-09-22 20:1x)
E223 — the first search walked up the corrected ladder, pre-registered (2026-09-22 04:2x; chain…
E238 — the rung-0/1 model that ships (pre-registered 2026-09-23 15:1x)