Experiments · E198b

With the reward's gate removed, is the brain's own gain signal still the worst?

Yes. It scored 136.9 against 153.2 for a fixed random gain, so the signal is better switched off.

In the log: queued (2026-09-19 22:08)

confirmedDate 2026-09-19 22:08, as written in the logrung 1 · ordering0 predictions · 2 result paragraphsEXPERIMENTS.md lines 12852–12858, lines 12960–12965
exp E198b diagram
What E198b did and how it came out, drawn from this record and the files it names (book/assets/diagrams/exp/E198b.svg).

Results

EXPERIMENTS.md · line 12852

E198b queued (2026-09-19 22:08). E198's verdict — live gain field worse than a fixed random one — was measured on the gated reward, which E201b shows distorted both scale and ranking. Two control arms (shuffle_frozen, random) re-run on the pure reward after E205; the live arm is E201b's fly (136.87 ± 2.14 AUC, 284 ± 22.6 finds). Prediction, on record: the ordering survives (live ≤ frozen ≈ random within one seed-sd) — the gate did not create the gain field's failure, it only changed the scale; if live now leads by more than one sd, E198's verdict is withdrawn outright. runs/e198b_chain.sh.

EXPERIMENTS.md · line 12960

E198b — the gain-field controls on the PURE reward. live (E201b fly) 136.9 / 284; frozen shuffle 143.2 / 293.5; fixed random 153.2 / 305.5. Prediction ("the ordering survives; the gate did not create the failure") confirmed: the head-derived live gain field is the worst of the three on the clean reward too, by 16 AUC_Q against random. E198's verdict stands and is now unconditional. The modulation channel carries nothing. For the book: switch it off (FORAGER_MODULATE=random is strictly better than the head's own).

The full record

This entry is written in 2 separate places in the log, shown here in log order.

EXPERIMENTS.md · lines 12852–12858

E198b queued (2026-09-19 22:08). E198's verdict — live gain field worse than a fixed random one — was measured on the gated reward, which E201b shows distorted both scale and ranking. Two control arms (shuffle_frozen, random) re-run on the pure reward after E205; the live arm is E201b's fly (136.87 ± 2.14 AUC, 284 ± 22.6 finds). Prediction, on record: the ordering survives (live ≤ frozen ≈ random within one seed-sd) — the gate did not create the gain field's failure, it only changed the scale; if live now leads by more than one sd, E198's verdict is withdrawn outright. runs/e198b_chain.sh.

EXPERIMENTS.md · lines 12960–12965

E198b — the gain-field controls on the PURE reward. live (E201b fly) 136.9 / 284; frozen shuffle 143.2 / 293.5; fixed random 153.2 / 305.5. Prediction ("the ordering survives; the gate did not create the failure") confirmed: the head-derived live gain field is the worst of the three on the clean reward too, by 16 AUC_Q against random. E198's verdict stands and is now unconditional. The modulation channel carries nothing. For the book: switch it off (FORAGER_MODULATE=random is strictly better than the head's own).

Related entries

Built with PRISMWebsite and visualizations made using Claude